Three key tips for option traders

Most new option traders start by selling covered calls. It is an income producing strategy where you sell a call option on a stock that you own to collect the option premium. However, the premium comes with an obligation, if the call option you sold is exercised by the buyer, you may be obligated to sell your shares of the underlying stock.

1.  Consider the ex-dividend date

A common mistake to avoid is selling a covered call near the ex-dividend date of a stock that you own. Sometimes investors will come in to buy a stock a few days before the dividend date causing the stock value to briefly go up. This could make it very profitable for the buyer of the call option to force you to sell and collect the dividend payment. Not only do you lose the dividend but your broker’s fee to sell your shares will be much higher than normal.

For example; Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.b) has an ex–dividend of May 17th and pays $0.94 per share every quarter. So if you sold a May 19th call option, your shares could be called away early if the call option is in the money.

2.  Open interest or liquidity

Sometimes there is a wide spread between the bid and ask price of an option based on trading volume or the amount of open interest. The open interest will tell you the total number of option contracts that haven’t been exercised or assigned. Many options on Canadian stocks are illiquid and the bid-ask spread can be really extensive.

For example; Shopify (shop) trades on the Canadian exchange at $128. 14 and $93.58 on the U.S. stock exchange. If you wanted to sell a cash secured put option June 125 strike price the bid is $4.50 and ask is $5.75 but the open interest is zero contracts. However, the June 90 put option on the U.S. exchange has an open interest of 873 contracts and the bid is $3.10 and ask is 3.30 making it much easier to trade.

3. Implied volatility can increase when earnings are released

Implied volatility represents the expected price action of the stock over the life of the option. As expectations change, or as the demand for the option increases, implied volatility will also rise. Earnings expectations can influence the option premiums that expire when companies release their earnings.

For example; Ulta Beauty (ulta) is currently trading around $297.55 and is reporting their earnings on May 25th. See the weekly at the money call and put options below:

Calls Bid Ask Open Interest
May 19 $297.50 $2.45 $2.85 141
May 26 $297.50 $8.90 $10.60 87
June 2  $297.50 $10.30 $11.80 0
June 9  $297.50 $10.80 $12.30 2

 

Puts Bid Ask Open Interest
May 19 $297.50 $2.45 $2.80 99
May 26 $297.50 $8.90 $10.50 13
June 2  $297.50 $10.40 $11.90 1
June 9  $297.50 $10.70 $12.00 0

Without the change in implied volatility  the May 26 calls and puts options bid-ask price would have been in the $4.90 to $5.60 range but earnings expectations have increased the value of these options. Take note of the wider bid-ask spread on the June 9 and 16 call and put options which have little or no open interest contracts.

Before you buy or sell options you should always check for the ex-dividend date and earnings release date. Keep a close eye on the number of open interest contracts, a large bid-ask spread could turn a profitable trade into a loser.

 

Disclaimer: The stocks mentioned in this post are for educational proposes only and not recommendations.

Warning signs that oil prices are range bound for many years

The future price of crude oil is very important to the Canadian economy and to investors in the Toronto stock market (TSX). The Canadian oil patch represents a 25% weighting in the overall index. Over the past few months, we have seen a massive sell-off of oil sands assets by foreigners.

In March, Royal Dutch Shell and Marathon Oil sold stakes in the Alberta oil sands project to Canadian Natural Resources for $12.7 billion. Marathon sold its 20% stake in the project for $2.5 billion. Later in March, Conoco Phillips sold their partnership in the oil sands to Cenovus Energy for $17.7 billion.

Reuters reported last week that BP is considering the sale of its stakes in three Canadian oil sands projects.

“BP’s 50 per cent stake in the Sunrise project near Fort McMurray in Alberta, where Husky Energy Inc owns the rest and is the operator, is the most valuable of the three assets. It also owns a 50 percent stake in Pike, operated by Devon Energy Corp, which is still awaiting a final investment decision, and is majority-owner of the Terre de Grace oil sands pilot project.”

Also in the news is Chevron was exploring the sale of its 20% stake in Canada’s Athabasca oil sands project which could fetch $2.5 billion.

“Faced with a lower oil price environment and challenging economics, which include high cost operations and carbon taxes, global players are increasingly put off by the oil sands.”

Extracting oil from the vast majority of Canada’s oil sands is a very labor and capital intensive process. It requires much higher crude oil prices to justify the more expensive extraction method. Global players exiting their oil sands positions could be a warning sign that the price of oil getting above the $60 level is overly optimistic.

The upcoming IPO of Saudi Arabia’s state own oil company (Saudi Aramco) is another warning sign that the price of oil could be range bound. The company’s oil assets are valued around 2 trillion dollars. It begs the question; why would Saudi Arabia sell part of its state own oil assets to investors?

The simple answer is the Saudi’s need more revenue to pay for their government spending programs. I believe that this is another warning sign that the price of oil will stay lower for much longer. OPEC’s current production cuts are aimed at stabilizing the oil market so that the Saudi Aramco IPO will be successful in raising much need cash for Saudi Arabia.

The key question for the future of the oil market is for how long can a surge in U.S. shale supplies make up for the slow pace of growth elsewhere in the oil sector. The 5 year chart below illustrates the returns on owning two different oil ETFs. You would have lost money owning the Canadian oil ETF (XEG) and you would have broken even on the Spider ETF (XLE). 

In my humble opinion, long term buy and hold investors should avoid oil stocks. I have been bearish on Canadian oil companies for a long time because our oil and gas is land lock. Our only customer is the United States and they have already put a 20% tariff on softwood lumber. There are growing tensions around renegotiating NAFTA which could lead to a tariff on Canadian oil. Oil stocks are still trade-able but you need to be very nibble.

 

Do you agree or disagree? All comments are welcomed.

 

Disclaimer: This post is for discussion purposes only, do your own research before you invest.

 

 

Baby Buffett loses 4 Billion on Valeant shares

Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman first came to my attention when he invested in Canadian Pacific railroad. As an activist investor, Ackman started a lengthy proxy battle with the board of directors to remove Fred Green as CEO and appoint Hunter Harrison in his place. Not only was Ackman successful but it was very profitable for his hedge fund since the value of CP shares more than doubled under Harrison’s leadership.

In early 2015, Bill Ackman invested in Valeant, another Canadian company. His hedge fund purchase shares around $196 and recently sold all of them at $11 a share. He accelerated his losses by buying call options and selling put options.

Hindsight is of course 20-20, are there any investment lessons that we can use?

 Lesson: Intelligent people are capable of doing very dumb things.

Bill Ackman is clearly a smart man otherwise his Pershing Square hedge fund wouldn’t manage pension fund money. But if you asked the average investment professional /your grandmother whether it is a good idea to stick over a quarter of your assets into a highly levered pharma roll up the answer would tend to be a firm “no”.

Lesson: Position sizing is very, very important.

Always be aware of your risk of ruin, no matter how much you are convinced the odds are in your favor. Regardless of how amazingly smart and brilliant you are and how many hundreds of hours of research you have done, it is perfectly possible that you will lose money on any given investment. Pershing Square had too large a position to simply sell its stake and walk away when things started to go wrong.

Lesson: Highly incentivized management teams can still blow themselves up, and take you down with them.

Part of the original appeal of Valeant to the hedge funds that backed it was how the CEO’s stock options had been structured to make him highly incentivized to get the share price as high as possible. Having management teams with “skin in the game” is clearly important but this does not mean they will not do something very stupid.

Lesson: Auctions are not usually very good places to find bargains.

Ackman admits that he now believes Valeant “substantially overpaid” for Salix, its last big acquisition before things fell apart. A big problem with a role up strategy is paying high prices for third rate assets that no one else in the world is willing to buy.

Lesson: Beware of political risk.

Valeant used aggressive drug pricing to help pay for their acquisitions which got the attention of American lawmakers. Bill Ackman had to testify at a hearing held by the U.S. Senate aging committee which was reviewing escalating drug prices. It also became a big issue during the U.S. 2016 presidential election.

Lesson: Take a loss, don’t let your Ego get in your way.

There is no doubt that billionaires tend to have large egos. Being labeled “Baby Buffett” on the cover of Forbes is quite the ego booster. But there is an old saying, “the bigger they are, the harder they fall”. Ackman’s buying call options and selling put options on a losing position is a clear sign that his ego wouldn’t accept taking a loss on Valeant shares.

Postscript: The share price of CSX railroad jumped up 35% on rumors that Hunter Harrison would be the new CEO. Harrison got the job but can he deliver another turnaround? It may be too early to tell. However, I bought some shares of CSX for my investment club. 

 

Active or passive investing? Why I now use both approaches

There is perhaps no controversy in the investing world more contentious than active versus passive equity investment management. Members of both camps constantly argue that their way is unequivocally the best, despite real-world results that support one side’s argument one year and the other’s the next.

Blackrock, the world’s largest money manager, is overhauling its actively managed equities business. They are cutting jobs, dropping fees and relying more on computers to pick stocks. This is a clear indication how difficult it has become for humans to beat the market.

“BlackRock  CEO Larry Fink has sometimes expressed disappointment in the performance of the company’s actively managed stock funds, and he has pivoted increasingly to focusing on the company’s data-driven “Scientific” equity teams.”

Most investors seem to be in either the active or passive camp, few use both methods. For years, I have been in the active camp because I use options to make money during up and down markets. However, providers of exchange traded funds (ETF’s) have evolved beyond just offering low cost sector and index funds.

The growing popularity of ETFs have increased competition among providers to attract investors to purchase their products. I have notice an increase in the number of products that include covered call and also some put right options.

                               A Partial list of Covered Call ETFs

Advisor Shares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA)
CBOE S&P 500 Buy Write Index ETN (BWV)
Credit Suisse Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI)
Credit Suisse Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO)
First Trust High Income ETF (FTHI)
First Trust Low Beta Income ETF (FTLB)
Horizons S&P 500 Covered Calls ETF (HSPX)
Recon Capital NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD)
S&P 500 BuyWrite Portfolio ETF (PBP)
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
First Asset Can-60 Covered Call ETF (LXF-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
First Asset Can-Energy Covered Call ETF (OXF-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
First Asset Can-Financials Covered Call ETF (FXF-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
First Asset Can-Materials Covered Call ETF (MXF-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange
First Asset Tech Giants Covered Call ETF (CAD Hedged) (TXF-TSX)listed on the Canadian TSX stock exchange

A key advantage of ETFs with covered call option writing is investors have some downward protection during these uncertain times. Plus you don’t have to be approved by your financial institution to trade options. Keep in mind that the management expensive ratios are going to be higher than index funds and these ETFs are also fairly new so it may be difficult to evaluate their past returns.

 

Disclaimer: These are not recommendations, do you own research before investing.

 

 

 

 

10 Reasons to be cautious on equity markets

Image result for david rosenberg

David Rosenberg is chief economist with Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. and author of the daily economic newsletter Breakfast with Dave.

Here are my 10 reasons to be cautious on equity markets right now.

Valuations are stretched

Trailing and forward price-to-earnings multiples are now in the top quintiles historically and the most expensive in 15 years.

Only in 1929 and the “Dotcom” bubble has the cyclically-adjusted multiple (CAPE) been as high as the case today.

We are heading into the ninth year in the cycle and have logged an epic 250-per-cent surge in the process. As retail investors now plow in to this market in the late innings, one could legitimately ask what it is they could possibly know that corporate insiders do not, considering the latter have been selling their company’s stock this year at a pace not seen since the data began to be published in 1988.

Extended leverage

U.S. margin debt has surged at a 27-per-cent annual rate since immediately prior to the election to stand at $513-billion, the highest level on record (eclipsing the high from April 2015).

Retail inflows

After an eight-year hiatus ($200-billion of net outflows), private clients have thrown in the towel and plowed nearly $80-billion into mutual funds and ETFs since the November election.

Remember Bob Farrell’s Rule No. 5: “The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom”.

Narrowing leadership

For the past four sessions, we have seen more new 52-week lows than new highs (the longest streak since Nov. 4) — a technical sign of a toppy market.

Moreover, the Russell 2000 index is now flat for the year and off 4 per cent from the high — again, we know from history that the generals tend to follow the privates.

Tack on the fact that the S&P 500 recently traded as much as 10 per cent above the 200-day moving average, and we have a market ripe for a near-term correction.

Complacency abounds

From a VIX of 11.9 to nearly 60-per-cent Bulls in the Investors Intelligence poll — though this has begun to roll off its highs in a sign of the “smart money” beginning to take profits.

The S&P 500 has gone 57 days without so much as a 1-per-cent intraday swing, something we have not seen in at least 35 years. The proverbial calm before the storm.

The Fed is in play

The front-end Treasury yields are rising discernibly — the two-year T-note yield has gapped up to nearly 1.4 per cent and futures market is in the process of pricing in an extra two rate hikes after the likely March tightening (the overnight index swaps market currently has priced in 70 basis points of tightening by year end).

The Fed has met its twin objectives and the fed funds rate consistent with that is 3 per cent, not the 0.75 per cent currently.

By the time the Fed reaches that level, the yield curve will likely have inverted long before and that’s when the clouds will come rolling in.

This could be next year’s story, which means a forward-looking market begins to discount this prospect sometime later this year.

Inflation pickup

Cyclical price pressures are showing through, with the core PCE inflation rate at a 30-month high of 1.738 per cent year over year.

As was the case in 1990, 2000 or 2007, this likely is not sustainable, but is a classic late-game signpost nonetheless.

All one needs to see is the latest blow-off in the commodity complex, which is now on pause, to notice how late cycle we are. Remember what oil did, for example, in 2008?

Lofty expectations

The survey data are at extremely high levels at a time when actual economic growth is running barely above a 1% annual rate.

Gaps like this, once again, are classic near-end-of-cycle developments.

The prospect of there being huge disappointment over the pace of policy change in Washington is also very high.

Over-ownership

While households were not net buyers of equities until very recently, the near-quadrupling in the stock market has still boosted their exposure to a 21.1-per-cent share of total assets. Only five times in the past 16 years has the share been this high or higher — this is 42% above the norm.

Frothy credit markets

Bonds lead stocks, just know that. And the risk-premium on U.S. high-yield corporate bonds very recently approached lows for the cycle at a super-tight 335 basis points.

However, they now are widening again, and with the overall narrowing path of the Treasury curve, this is well worth monitoring for those equity investors who are still long this market.

Nobody ever lost money by booking a profit, especially for a cycle that is now heading into year number nine.

Do you think that David is right?

Being Canadian, I am worried about the Federal Budget scheduled for March 22 because there are rumours of an increase in the capital gains tax. I have been taking some profits in my taxable accounts and for investment club just in case. I do believe it is impossible to time the market so I am still fully invested in my tax sheltered accounts.

 

Gilead Sciences: A buy, Sell or Hold?

gild-2

Many money managers have made Gilead a top investment pick when interview on some popular business shows. I never buy a stock based solely on the recommendation of a media personality. However, I will put it on my watch list and do some fundamental research and study some chart patterns.

Back in November of 2014, I decided to dollar cost average some Gilead shares using a strangle option strategy. I ended up owning 200 shares at $102.00 and made some nice profits selling covered calls. Unfortunately, the share price has been in free fall since Aug of 2015. See the chart below:

gild

I managed to reduce my average cost down to $90.50 but Gilead tumbled to a record low on Feb 8th after the company provided guidance for fiscal 2017 revenue, which missed analysts’ expectations. See press release:

The research-based biopharmaceutical company said it expects fiscal 2017 net product sales of $22.5 billion – $24.5 billion, below the Capital IQ consensus estimate of $27.98 billion.

Gilead reported late Tuesday Q4 non-GAAP earnings of $2.70 per share, a dime better than the analyst consensus on Capital IQ. Revenue was $7.32 billion, vs. expectations of $7.16 billion.

HCV product sales, were $3.2 billion for the fourth quarter of 2016, compared to $4.9 billion for the same period in 2015.

Price: $65.93, Change: -$7.20, Percent Change: -9.85

Is Gilead turning into a value trap or a real value investment?

valuetrap-300x250

This stock is cheap with a PE ratio of 6.68 compared to the biotechnology industry average of 34.55. Gilead has a 3.13% dividend yield which is the highest within the industry. It has one of the highest ROEs of all companies in the biotechnology & drug industries. Although, EPS growth at Gilead is declining, it is still above the industry average.

The biggest problem with this stock is the biotech industry is experiencing positive revenue growth as a whole but Gilead has been unable to grow revenues and is losing market share. This negative trend has been continuing from the previous year when revenue growth at Gilead was -13.94% while the biotech industry was up some 202.65%.

I hate throwing good money after bad in the hopes of breaking even. So I am not big on averaging down on a losing position. I have been fighting a losing battle on this stock for quite a long time. However, I am anticipating a dead cat bounce off the bottom if some deep value or dividend investors decide to buy. I think that I should take a lost and buy something else. What do you think?

Do you own Gilead, are you going to average down, sell for a lost or are you going to continue to hold?

Carbon tax: a sign that oil prices will stay lower for longer

The federal government of Canada plans to impose a national carbon tax on any province that refuses to establish one on their own. They argue that putting a price on carbon will give people and companies an incentive to look for lower emission options to save money.

In reality, Canada is the second largest country in the world, just ahead of the United States and behind Russia However, our population is one-tenth the size of our largest trading partner, the United States and one-quarter the size of Russia. I estimate that 75% of Canadians live in rural areas where driving is a necessity and switching to electric heating or electric cars is way too expensive.

At the Golden Globe Awards, Meryl Streep called Canadian actors nice. I would like to add that we, as a nation, are dumb when it comes to energy. Refineries in Eastern Canada are spending billions to purchase about 700,000 barrels a day of foreign oil to meet customer needs while 3 million barrels of Western Canadian oil is sold to the United States at a discount due to lack of pipeline capacity between producing fields in Western Canada and refineries in the East.

Our governments rely on tax revenues from the oil and gas industry which are down with the price of oil. In truth, this carbon tax has nothing to do with lowering emissions but just another tax grab. This is a clear sign that the government believes a rebound in the price of oil is many years away.

The Canadian economy is fragile and the last thing it needs is yet another tax. The potential costs for the average Canadian family by 2022 is up to $2,569 per year. The carbon tax will also increase the price of food and clothing. It will mean lost jobs and make Canadian businesses less competitive.

Lack of pipelines makes me bearish on the Canadian oil patch

  1. It will take years to build the Keystone XL pipeline even if approved by Trump. Plus there will be a massive backlash, both on the ground and in the courts that could tie this project up for many more years.
  2. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau gave the green light to Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion but I expect protestors will also delay this project.
  3. The Line 3 Replacement Program was also approved and is the largest project in Enbridge’s history. The anticipated in-service date for this project is 2019, pending U.S. regulatory approvals.

Additional reasons to be bearish on Canadian oil stocks

  1. Most Canadian oil companies are still losing money
  2. The profitable ones have very high price to earnings ratios (CNQ – EPS for 2017 is $1.04 or 39 times earnings and SU is 27 times earnings for 2017)
  3. Shipping oil by rail is way more expensive than by pipeline
  4. The biggest risk to the Canadian oil patch is Trump! He could put a 20% border tax on imported oil.

Foreign oil stocks that I own for yield

I bought some Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) for it’s 6.8% yield in my wife’s retirement account. The dividend is exempt from U.S. withholding tax because it is in a retirement account. Converting the U.S. dividend to Canadian dollars gives me a current yield of 6.8% times 1.32 or 8.98% which is much higher than owning bonds. Plus I can sell covered call options that could boost my returns by 5% or to protect against a fall in oil prices.

I also own Alerian MLP ETF (AMPL) which is a energy partners ETF with a 8% U.S. dollar yield. It has a 10.5% yield in Canadian dollars but does has a high management fee of 0.85%, still better than owning bonds. There are higher yielding limited partnerships but they carry more risk than owning an ETF.

U.S. Shale producers are on my watch list

The majority of these producers are still losing money. At the top of my watch list is Marathon oil (MRO) which is currently trading at $17. 45 but has a book value of $27.40. Their losses have been decreasing and the earnings estimates for a fourth quarter is for a loss of 15 cents a share. I am waiting for Marathon to release their results on Feb 15 to confirm that they are lessening their losses and that their revenue is increasing before I invest.

What oil stocks do you own and why?

Disclaimer: Please do your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor.